HHS Releases Mediocre Report on Hospitals
News & World Report’s “Best Hospitals 2006.” Ah… news you may not know
“Wow, that is spectacular!” Yes, that would be nice. We’d even settle for, “Gee, that is really helpful.” But, when the division of Health and Human Services (HHS) released its most recent report on hospital quality, the collective response was, “Uhm - so what?”
It’s too poor. It appears the intentions are admirable: give the American consumer greater access to info that assesses a hospitals performance in critical care areas. In that case, the focus in on the treatment of heart attacks and heart failure, pneumonia, and the occurrence of surgical infections. This is info we’d like to know.
Unfortunately, the new release does little to inform. The notes on heart attacks, for example, provides percentages for patients receiving various treatments:
…Little - which is more than nothing. That’s why the report receives a “mediocre” rating. It’s better than nothing, but not by too much. There is still a distant way to go in providing the American health care consumer with useful hospital quality assessments.
In the meantime, you may want to revisit the U.S. That’s the way to assess - and report - hospital quality.
To read more about the release of the recent report, see that from Reuters. To view the actual report, and to find details on hospitals within your region, see that from the Department of Health and Human Services.
Original post by tim
No comments yet. Be the first.
Leave a reply



















